The Bizarre Behavior of The Nation

April 12, 2008

Phil tells us that The Nation is furiously denouncing anyone who would dare suggest that Obama is anti-Israel, even denouncing totally mainstream Palestinian advocates like Rashid Khalidi in the process.

Way back when I had illusions about the possibilities of a righteous left, I hated The Nation like it was nobody’s business.  Certainly even now I have no love lost for it.   But they deserve credit where its due, and historically that has included the Middle East.

What makes all of this so bizarre is the odyssey of their star columnist Eric Alterman, who went from siding with Bill Buckley’s witch hunt against alleged anti-Semites (but really just anyone who opposed the First Gulf War and George H.W. Bush’s conversion to the Henry Wallace movement) to becoming, first, the foremost defender on the left of Walt and Mearsheimer, which he followed up with his most excellent article on Marty Peretz in The American Prospect.  Alterman was even so bold as to declare, much less acknowledge, that the future of Judaism itself is at stake.

Yet the article could only run in The American Prospect, not The Nation!!!  This struck me as both odd and significant at the time, and confirmed first by The Nation suddenly taking an all but 180-degree turn when it published this negative book review by Daniel Lazare, and now with the present calumny.

There was definitely a change in party line at The Nation – I attended in September 2006 a symposium/debate on the Walt-Mearsheimer paper at Cooper Union where The Nation had one of only two or three literature tables outside.  But today, they have no problem with Obama’s relationship with their ex-terrorist friend Bill Ayers (I myself am more than willing to overlook it as well), but a pussycat of an Arab professor at Columbia is beyond the pale.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “The Bizarre Behavior of The Nation”

  1. mtraven Says:

    Obama’s relationship with Ayers is very tenuous (as far as I know) — they moved in some of the same circles in Hyde Park, but to call them “friends” is a stretch. Although I’m no fan of Ayers, calling him a “terrorist” is also a stretch — the Weathermen were mostly blowing up buildings (and themselves), not crowds of innocent people. So, maybe you shouldn’t be spreading that particular meme.

  2. brooklyncopperhead Says:

    That sounds about right if not just a bit understated, I referred to Ayers as a friend of The Nation, not of Obama. As for whether or not the Weathermen were terrorists, I suppose if I must the better term would be aspiring terrorists.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: